<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Chasing the Wind - Latest Comments in Ha.  I was Right.  LA Time Cheated.</title><link>http://chasingthewind.disqus.com/</link><description>Faith.  News.  Fun.</description><atom:link href="https://chasingthewind.disqus.com/ha_i_was_right_la_time_cheated/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:04:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ha.  I was Right.  LA Time Cheated.</title><link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/06/15/ha-i-was-right-la-time-cheated/#comment-11888249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think thats the first time I ever saw shenanigans spelled out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:04:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ha.  I was Right.  LA Time Cheated.</title><link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/06/15/ha-i-was-right-la-time-cheated/#comment-11888247</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe I've never paid attention - it was the Arnold elections when I first heard about the shenanigans the LA Times was pulling.  Until then, I thought they were your normal left-wing big city newspaper.  Now I know they're quacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:48:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ha.  I was Right.  LA Time Cheated.</title><link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/06/15/ha-i-was-right-la-time-cheated/#comment-11888246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think LA Times and the word respectable can exist in the same sentence without giving me a giggle.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Uptown Girl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 05:17:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>